9.2 Cross Sectional Elements

9.2.1 Overview

This section discusses the features and design criteria for the roadway portion of mobility corridors and includes the following subsections:
  • Lane width and number;
  • Shoulders;
  • Pavement cross slope;
  • Vertical clearance;
  • Stopping sight distance;
  • Grades;
  • Horizontal alignment;
  • Superelevation;
  • Superelevation transition; and
  • Vertical curves.
Departure from these guidelines is discussed in .

9.2.2 Travel Lane Width and Number of Lanes

The lane width of a mobility corridor is 13-ft. The number of lanes required to accommodate the anticipated design year traffic is determined by the level of service evaluation as discussed in the .

9.2.3 Shoulders

The minimum shoulder width of a mobility corridor is 12-ft. This width applies to both inside and outside shoulders, regardless of the number of mainlanes. Shoulders must be continuously surfaced and be maintained.

9.2.4 Pavement and Cross Slope

Multilane divided pavements must be inclined in the same direction. The recommended pavement cross slope is 2 percent. Shoulders should be sloped sufficiently to drain surface water but not to an extent that safety concerns are created for vehicular use.
To facilitate pavement drainage, highways with three or more lanes inclined in the same direction should have an increasing cross slope as the distance from the crown line increases. In these cases, the first two lanes adjacent to the crown line may be sloped flatter than normal – typically at 1.5 percent but not less than 1 percent. The cross slope of each successive pair of lanes (or single lane if it is the outside lane) outward from the crown should be increased by 0.5 to 1 percent from the cross slope of the adjacent lane. A cross slope should not exceed 3 percent on a tangent alignment unless there are three or more lanes in one direction of travel.
Bridge structures with three or more lanes in one direction should maintain a constant slope of 2.5 percent, transitioning before and after the bridge accordingly.

9.2.5 Vertical Clearance

Guidance on Vertical Clearance is presented in .

9.2.6 Stopping Sight Distance

Stopping sight distance for mobility corridors is calculated using Perception-Reaction Distance and Deceleration Distance. The calculated and design distances are shown in . Significant changes from level grade may affect deceleration distance. Adjustment factors can be found in .
Table 9-1: Mobility Corridor Stopping Sight Distance on Level Grade
Design Speed (mph)
Break Reaction Distance
1
(ft)
Braking Distance (ft)
Stopping Sight Distance
Calculated (ft)
Design (ft)
85
312.4
693.5
1,005.9
1,010
90
330.8
777.5
1,108.3
1,110
95
349.1
866.21
1,215.3
1,220
100
367.5
959.8
1,327.3
1,330
Notes:
  1. Brake reaction distance predicated on a time of 2.5-s; deceleration rate 11.2-ft/s².
Table 9-2: Adjustment to Braking Distance On Grades
Grade
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
1%
2%
3%
4%
Adjustment
1.130
1.094
1.061
1.030
0.972
0.946
0.921
0.897

9.2.7 Grades

Undesirable speed differentials between vehicle types suggest that limiting the rate and length of the grades should be considered. Passenger vehicles are not significantly affected by grades as steep as 3 percent, regardless of initial speed. Grades above 2 percent may affect truck traffic depending on length of grade.
summarizes the maximum grade controls in terms of design speed.
Table 9-3: Mobility Corridor Maximum Grades
Type of Terrain
Design Speed (mph)
85
90
95
100
Level
3%
3%
3%
3%
Rolling
4%
4%
4%
4%

9.2.8 Horizontal Alignment

shows the maximum allowable side friction factors and assumed running speeds for design speeds from 85-mph to 100-mph. The maximum side friction force is only realized at full superelevation and should be avoided unless conditions where limited space places constraints on the horizontal geometry allow no other options. These maximum side forces may be allowed for temporary traffic control during construction or maintenance.
Table 9-4: Mobility Corridor Side Friction Factors and Running Speeds for Horizontal Curves
Design Speed (mph)
Maximum Allowable Friction Factor
Assumed Running Speed (mph)
85
0.07
67
90
0.06
70
95
0.05
75
1
100
0.04
82
1
Notes:
  1. Values adjusted up to accommodate application of AASHTO Method 5 calculations.

9.2.9 Superelevation

and show minimum superelevation rates of various radii and design speeds for an e
max
of 6 percent and 8 percent, respectively. For multi-lane facilities, particularly where wide medians are used,
the radius applies to the innermost travel lane.
Table 9-5: Minimum Radii and Superelevation Rates
1
for Mobility Corridors, e
max
= 6%
Superelevation
Rate,
e
(%)
85
mph
R (ft)
90
mph
R (ft)
95
mph
R (ft)
100
mph
R (ft)
NC
2,3
30,104
38,571
50,139
66,667
RC
4,5
14,290
15,850
18,350
22,010
2.2
12,930
14,360
16,650
19,970
2.4
11,790
13,120
15,230
18,270
2.6
10,830
12,070
14,020
16,830
2.8
10,000
11,170
12,990
15,600
3.0
9,290
10,400
12,100
14,530
3.2
8,660
9,710
11,320
13,590
3.4
8,110
9,110
10,630
12,770
3.6
7,610
8,580
10,010
12,040
3.8
7,170
8,100
9,460
11,380
4.0
6,770
7,660
8,970
10,790
4.2
6,410
7,270
8,520
10,250
4.4
6,080
6,920
8,110
9,770
4.6
5,780
6,590
7,740
9,330
4.8
5,510
6,300
7,400
8,920
5.0
5,260
6,020
7,090
8,540
5.2
5,020
5,770
6,800
8,200
5.4
4,790
5,530
6,530
7,880
5.6
4,550
5,310
6,280
7,580
5.8
4,260
5,040
6,020
7,280
6.0
3,710
4,500
5,470
6,670
Notes:
  1. Computed using Superelevation Distribution Method 5. Refer to AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets for the different types of Superelevation Distribution Methods.
  2. a) The term “NC” (normal crown) represents an equal downward cross-slope, typically 2%, on each side of the axis of rotation.
    b) The minimum curve radii for normal crown are suitable up to 3.0%.
    c) 3.0% normal crown should only be used when 3 or more lanes are sloped in the same direction.
    d) 1.5% or flatter normal crown should only be used for the design of special circumstance, such as table-topping intersections, or the evaluation of existing conditions.
  3. The minimum radii for normal crown (NC) are computed assuming a cross slope of-2.0% with side friction limited to 0.036, 0.034, 0.032, and 0.030 for 85, 90, 95 and 100 mph respectively. If outer lanes are sloped at -3.0% it is assumed traffic will be at the lower running speeds.
  4. The term “RC” (reverse crown) represents a curve where the downward, or adverse, cross-slope should be removed by superelevating the entire roadway at the normal cross-slope rate.
  5. For curve radii falling between normal crown and reverse crown, a plane slope across the entire pavement equal to the normal crown should typically be used. A transition from the normal crown to a straight-line cross slope will be needed.
Table 9-6: Minimum Radii and Superelevation Rates¹ for mobility Corridors e
max
= 8%
Superelevation Rate, e (%)
85 mph R (ft)
90 mph R (ft)
95 mph R (ft)
100 mph R (ft)
NC
2,3
30,104
38,571
50,139
66,667
RC
4,5
14,700
16,220
18,730
22,400
2.2%
13,330
14,740
17,020
20,360
2.4%
12,200
13,500
15,600
18,660
2.6%
11,240
12,450
14,400
17,220
2.8%
10,420
11,550
13,370
15,990
3.0%
9,700
10,780
12,470
14,920
3.2%
9,080
10,100
11,690
13,990
3.4%
8,530
9,490
11,000
13,160
3.6%
8,040
8,960
10,390
12,430
3.8%
7,600
8,480
9,840
11,770
4.0%
7,210
8,050
9,350
11,180
4.2%
6,850
7,660
8,900
10,650
4.4%
6,530
7,310
8,490
10,160
4.6%
6,230
6,990
8,120
9,720
4.8%
5,960
6,690
7,780
9,320
5.0%
5,710
6,420
7,470
8,940
5.2%
5,480
6,170
7,180
8,600
5.4%
5,260
5,930
6,910
8,280
5.6%
5,060
5,720
6,670
7,980
5.8%
4,880
5,520
6,440
7,700
6.0%
4,710
5,330
6,220
7,450
6.2%
4,550
5,150
6,020
7,210
6.4%
4,390
4,990
5,830
6,980
6.6%
4,250
4,830
5,650
6,770
6.8%
4,120
4,690
5,490
6,570
7.0%
3,990
4,550
5,330
6,380
7.2%
3,870
4,420
5,180
6,200
7.4%
3,760
4,300
5,040
6,030
7.6%
3,640
4,180
4,900
5,870
7.8%
3,510
4,070
4,780
5,720
8.0%
3,210
3,860
4,630
5,560
  1. Computed using Superelevation Distribution Method 5. Refer to AASHTO’s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets for the different types of Superelevation Distribution Methods.
  2. a) The term “NC” (normal crown) represents an equal downward cross-slope, typically 2%, on each side of the axis of rotation.
    b) The minimum curve radii for normal crown are suitable up to 3.0%.
    c) 3.0% normal crown should only be used when 3 or more lanes are sloped in the same direction
    d) 1.5% or flatter normal crown should only be used for the design of special circumstance, such as table-topping intersections, or the evaluation of existing conditions.
  3. The minimum radii for normal crown (NC) are computed assuming a cross slope of-2.0% with side limited to 0.036, 0.034, 0.032, and 0.030 for 85, 90, 95 and 100 mph respectively. If outer lanes are sloped at -3.0% it is assumed traffic will be at the lower running speeds.
  4. The term “RC” (reverse crown) represents a curve where the downward, or adverse, cross-slope should be removed by superelevating the entire roadway at the normal cross-slope rate.
  5. For curve radii falling between normal crown and reverse crown, a plane slope across the entire pavement equal to the normal crown should typically be used. A transition from the normal crown to a straight-line cross slope will be needed.

9.2.10 Superelevation Transition

Desirable design values for length of superelevation transition are based on a given maximum relative gradient between profiles of the edge of traveled way and the axis of rotation. shows recommended maximum relative gradient values. Transition length on this basis is directly proportional to the total superelevation, which is the product of the lane width and the change in the cross slope. For superelevation on bridge structures, it is preferred to begin/end superelevation transition at a bridge bent line.
Table 9-7: Maximum Relative gradient for Superelevation Transition
Design Speed (mph)
Maximum Relative Gradient, %
1
Equivalent Maximum Relative Slope (V:H)
85-100
0.50
1:200
Notes:
Maximum relative gradient for profile between edge of traveled way and axis of rotation.

9.2.11 Vertical Curves

Vertical curves create a gradual transition between different grades which is essential for the safe and efficient operation of a roadway. The lengths of both crest and sag vertical curves are controlled by the available sight distance.
Vertical curves are required for all grade breaks on mobility corridors.
Minimum K-values are calculated using the same equations as in . Design Ks for both crest and sag vertical curves are shown in .
Table 9-8: Minimum Design K Values for Crest and Sag Vertical Curves
Design Speed
(mph)
Stopping Sight Distance
(ft)
Crest Vertical Curves
(K)
Sag Vertical Curves
(K)
85
1,010
473
260
90
1,110
571
288
95
1,220
690
319
100
1,330
820
350
The length of a sag vertical curve that satisfies the driver comfort criteria is 60 percent of the sag vertical curve length required by the sight distance control. Driver comfort control should be reserved for special use and where continuous lighting systems are in place.