7.4 Traffic Control Plan

Traffic control is planned during preliminary engineering, however detailed Traffic Control Plan (TCP) plan sheets, appropriate for the complexity of the project are developed during the final design phase of project development. TCP sheets provide for moving traffic (including bicyclist, pedestrians, and transit vehicles) through or around the construction work zone in a safe, expeditious, and clear manner.
A TCP typically consists of the following plan sheets:
  • Traffic Control Plan Narrative;
  • Traffic Control Plan Typical Sections;
  • Traffic Control Plan Layouts;
  • Traffic Control Plan Miscellaneous Details; and
  • Traffic Control Standards.
TCP plan sheets for low rigor projects typically include the TCP Narrative sheet and applicable standards as a minimum.
The TCP must clearly show provisions to efficiently move users through or around a work zone with minimal delay and minimize potential hazards to transportation users in the vicinity of a work zone and highway workers at the work zone interface with traffic. Workers include, but are not limited to, contractor and subcontractor personnel, utilities, TxDOT, and law enforcement performing duties within the transportation ROW.
Coordination of work zone impacts may extend beyond the physical location of the work zone itself and to all modes of transportation, workers, and/or the regional transportation network. The scope of the coordination is based on the project characteristics to provide optimal development of the project TCP.
Refer to the RDM for temporary traffic control design criteria. Refer to the TMUTCD and TxDOT Traffic Standards for guidance on TCP design.

7.4.1 TCP Narrative

The TCP Narrative describes the sequence of work (i.e., the construction staging) to be performed as shown in subsequent TCP sheets. Construction staging plans detail the recommended phasing of project improvements. Staging must maximize mobility and safety during construction, while considering ease of construction.
Considerations in developing construction staging include:
  • Evaluate potential of construction impacts on existing traffic (e.g., pavement drop offs, work adjacent to travel lanes, placement of barrier, lane closures, etc.);
  • Consider the need for nighttime illumination of construction area;
  • Coordinate with District Pavement Engineer to obtain temporary pavement designs;
  • Make sure that nontypical and transition areas are modeled accordingly;
  • Consider safe operation for pedestrians and bicyclists in all stages of construction including markings, traffic control devices, and barriers;
  • Provide continuous safe access to all properties during construction. Staging must consider property owner access, and this must be included in the plans; and
  • Evaluate the effects of construction on utility adjustments (e.g., ensure excavation does not impact utility foundations, etc.).

7.4.2 TCP Typical Sections and Layouts

The TCP Narrative (i.e., construction staging) is generally conveyed through TCP typical sections and TCP layouts. For traffic control on existing pavement and parallel routes, provide a detailed layout and arrangement of construction signs, construction pavement markings, traffic control devices (including temporary signals and signal heads), and drainage facilities for each construction stage. Bicycle, pedestrian, and transit vehicles should also be considered when developing a TCP layout.
Dimension typical sections and plans both horizontally and vertically as necessary to result in a safe product. Use various shading of shapes to differentiate the construction stages (e.g., solid shade for previous stage construction, hatched pattern for current stage construction, etc.).
TCP must maximize traffic operations and road user/construction worker safety during construction. Details may be needed for parallel routes or shifted traffic on existing pavement. Nighttime work may also be specified.
TxDOT standard sheets must be used whenever possible because of contractor and inspector familiarity with these sheets. Details may be developed to provide a higher level of information and direction than contained in the standard sheets.

7.4.3 TCP Miscellaneous Details

Miscellaneous layouts and details are included in the plan set to depict items such as detours, temporary ramp details, temporary retaining wall/shoring details, etc. Specific information on the design of detours is provided in .
7.4.3.1 Detour Plans
Detours may be required to maintain traffic during certain construction stages. Detours may include rerouting traffic to existing parallel routes, constructing temporary paved routes, or a combination thereof. Impacts to existing parallel routes and the capacity to handle additional traffic must be analyzed. Improvements to detour routes may be needed, such as pavement overlay, bridge widening, bridge replacements, adjustment to signal timing or intersection improvement for truck turning movements.
Detailed layout and arrangement of construction signs, construction pavement markings, traffic control devices, and interim drainage facilities must be provided for each detour. Coordinate with the District Pavement Engineer to obtain detour pavement designs. Plans must include typical section, grade, stopping sight distance, horizontal curve radii, and superelevation, as appropriate. Refer to the RDM for temporary traffic control criteria. Consult the TMUTCD and the Traffic Standards to develop the TCP.
Considerations in developing detour plans include:
  • Determine if a temporary construction easement is required and coordinate this with District environmental and ROW staff;
  • Coordinate detour plans with local entities and major traffic generators;
  • Evaluate impact on existing utilities (e.g., access utility cover and clearances);
  • Make sure that nontypical and transition areas are modeled accordingly;
  • Consider safe operation for motorcycles, pedestrians and bicyclists in all stages of construction including pavement markings, traffic control devices, and barriers;
  • Consider impacts to schools, emergency vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and neighborhoods due to traffic rerouting;
  • Detours must be designed to operate at the existing regulatory speed whenever possible. When this cannot be accomplished, an advisory speed may be used or a Request for Regulatory Construction Speed Zone (Form 1204) must be submitted. Design the detour to meet the approved lowered construction speed limit; and
  • Provide continuous safe access to all properties during construction. Staging and detour design must consider property owner access, and this must be included in the plans.
Coordination and preliminary approval of road closure/detour plans is initiated when a road closure or detour is first considered.
7.4.3.2 Approval Of Road Closure/Detour Plans
Closing a roadway during construction may impact local governments and businesses, emergency services, school districts, and the post office. Coordinate with entities such as the post office, county, city, school district, major employers, and emergency vehicle response teams to minimize the impact of a road closure on the community. Discussion and preliminary approval of road closure/detour plans is initiated when a road closure or detour is first considered.
On-system roadways must not be closed, unless highly unusual circumstances exist. On-system closures require an executed signed Form TEA30A “Agreement for Temporary System Closure of State Right of Way” obtained from CSD.
Impacts to off-system roadways may result from completely closing a roadway to rehabilitate or replace a bridge or from using an off-system facility as a detour route for an on-system closure. These impacts must be coordinated with the affected local entities. Obtain written concurrence from entities having jurisdiction over affected roadways. Place signed local entity concurrence documents in the project File of Record (see ).
For all temporary road closures, prepare a Temporary Road Closure Approval Memorandum to be signed by the District Engineer that contains the following information:
  • Project description;
  • Detour route map (include location of the project site, the detour route including length and current physical condition, the amount of traffic (ADT), and the percentage of trucks using the road to be closed);
  • Anticipated road closure duration;
  • Recommendations to expedite project completion (i.e., calendar days, liquidated damages); and
  • Documentation of required notifications, concurrence letters and/or agreements.
Submit a signed copy of the District Engineer’s Temporary Road Closure Approval Memorandum to DES with the RTL plans and supporting documents.
Impacts to the traveling public due to detours may be calculated in the form of road user costs. If these impacts are substantial, a special provision may be included in the PS&E to require payment of increased liquidated damages by the contractor. Refer to the TxDOT.gov Road User Costs webpage for information on calculating road user costs.
Table 7-1: Document Coordination with Affected Entities
Closed Route Type
Detouring To
Documentation Required
Off-System
Off-System
On-System
Letter of concurrence signed by city and county officials
On-System
Off-System
Executed “Agreement for Temporary System Closure of State Right of Way” outlining the responsibilities between Contracting Parties
On-System
On-System
Return receipt or signature confirmation to document that notification was delivered to local government officials (including post office, fire, police, EMS, and school district)

7.4.4 TCP Contract Requirements

A TCP may require developing specific contract requirements. These requirements are shown on the plan sheets or are included in the General Notes along with required Special Provisions in the specification list. Request a copy of the District’s Master General Notes (refer to TxDOT’s
PS&E Preparation Manual
) to obtain specific language to address the following subjects:
  • Work hour restrictions;
  • Lane closure restrictions;
  • Access to work area;
  • Use of off-duty law enforcement personnel; and
  • Accelerated construction provisions.

7.4.5 TCP Review

Each District must have a District Safety Review Team (DSRT). The DSRT is a multidisciplinary team of individuals having sufficient authority to implement, monitor, and review the application of safety techniques and strategies, including project traffic control plans.
The DSRT may be made up of members from the following list:
  • District Design Engineer;
  • District Construction Engineer;
  • District Traffic Engineer;
  • District Maintenance Engineer;
  • Area Engineer;
  • Traffic Safety Coordinator; and
  • Public Information Officer.
The DSRT reviews as many traffic control plans as practical, but more importantly, the DSRT should be involved in developing the TCP to eliminate the need for lengthy reviews. The review process must address all areas which influence work zone operations. Some projects may require a focus on a particular area of concern. Apply lessons learned from previous projects’ review efforts to address safety and mobility.
Generally, the DSRT reviews TCP during the Detailed (60%) milestone submission review by the District and subsequent milestone submissions as deemed necessary.
  • Coordination:
  •  District Traffic Engineer
  •  District Pavement Engineer
  •  District ROW staff
  •  CSD staff
  •  Local government officials (if applicable)
  • Available training:
  •  PLN210 – Plan Work Zone Traffic Control
  •  TCC358 – Temporary Traffic Control and Safety in Short-term Wok Zones