14.2.2.2.3 Step Three: Determine BLTS Adjustments
As stated previously, separated bicycle lanes and bicyclists using pedestrian crossings at signalized intersection crosswalks are classified as BLTS 1.
For bicycle accommodations that are not separated, accommodations that are mixed traffic bicycle accommodations, and accommodations at intersection approaches, use the BLTS classification designated in step two. For bicycle accommodations that are unsignalized intersection crossings or midblock crossings, use the overall BLTS classification determined in step two, adjusted for any crosswalk enhancements. The crosswalk enhancement adjustments are shown in .
Treatment 1 | Adjustment |
---|---|
High-visibility crosswalk markings, parking restrictions on crosswalk approach, adequate nighttime lighting levels, and crossing warning signs | -0.5 |
Raised crosswalk | -1.0 |
Advance Yield Here To (Stop Here For) bicycle sign and yield (stop) line | -0.5 |
In-street bicycle crossing sign | -0.5 |
Curb extension | -0.5 |
Bicycle refuge island | -1.0 |
RRFB | -1.0 |
PHB | -1.0 |
1
The maximum reduction is 2 classification levels or BLTS 2, whichever comes firstIf a bicycle route is comprised of multiple accommodations, the BLTS classification with the highest level of traffic stress governs the entire route (e.g., a route comprised of a BLTS 2 bicycle lane, a BLTS 3 intersection approach, and a BLTS 4 midblock crossing would receive a BLTS 4 classification).
Examples
of a completed inventory and BLTS classification for an on-system bicycle facility are shown in and . In the first
example
shown in , the bicycle facility was a bicycle lane between intersections. The first step was to determine which inventory and classification template table to use (see Appendix O, Section 3 – BLTS Inventory and Classification
). The upper table in the BLTS Inventory and Classification Template was used based on the footnote at the bottom of the table that states, “Applicable to bike accommodations that are adjacent to vehicular traffic”. Next, an inventory was conducted for the facility in question, the collected data was based on the BLTS Inventory and Classification Template
chosen, and for this example included the following data:- Bike lane width;
- Determined to be five feet
- On-street parking width;
- Determined that it is not applicable for this facility
- Through lanes per direction; and
- Determined to be one
- Posted speed
- Determined to be 35 mph
The collected data was used to determine the BLTS classification of the facility based on a single reference table. It is important to select the correct table. Although there are two reference tables on the BLTS Inventory and Classification template table, only one is selected, based on if the facility is adjacent to on-street parking. In this
example
, there is no on-street parking, so was used to determine the BLTS classification. Based on , a bicycle accommodation adjacent to vehicular traffic with a five-foot bicycle lane width, a 35-mph speed limit, and one through lane of vehicular traffic per direction is given a BLTS 3 classification. This type of facility is not eligible for treatment reductions, therefore the final classification of this facility is BLTS 3. In part 2 of this example
(see ), the next portion of this bicycle route will be inventoried. Although a BLTS 3 classification was given to this facility, if other portions of the route are classified inferior, they will govern the entire route.Facility: Bicycle Lane between intersections | |||
Characteristic | Value | BLTS Reference Table | BLTS Classification |
Bike lane width (ft) | 5 | Table 14-23 | BLTS 3 |
On-street parking width (ft) | Not applicable | ||
Through lanes per direction | 1 | ||
Posted speed (mph) | 35 |
In the second
example
shown in , the bicycle facility was a bicycle lane at an intersection approach. The first step was to determine which inventory and classification template table to use (see Appendix O, Section 3 – BLTS Inventory and Classification
). The third table from the top in the BLTS Inventory and Classification Template was used based on the footnote at the bottom of the table that states, “Applicable to bicycle facilities at intersection approaches.” It was determined that most bicyclists cross the intersection on the bike lane and do not use the pedestrian crosswalk. Next, an inventory was conducted for the facility in question, the collected data was based on the BLTS Inventory and Classification Template
chosen, and for this example included the following data:- Right-turn length;
- Determined to be 200 feet
- Number of lanes crossed; and
- Determined to be four
- Posted Speed
- Determined to be 35 mph
The collected data was used to determine the BLTS classification of the facility based on a single reference table. Although there are three reference tables on the BLTS Inventory and Classification template, only one is selected, based on if the facility is for a through-right movement or left turn and if the facility is mixed with traffic or if there is a bike lane. In this
example
, this is a through-right movement and is in mixed traffic, so was used to determine the BLTS classification. Based on , a bicycle accommodation that approaches an intersection with a 200-foot right turn lane, crosses four lanes through the intersection, and has a posted speed of 35 mph is given a BLTS 4 classification. This type of facility is not eligible for treatment reductions, therefore the final classification of this facility is BLTS 4. Example 1 (Part 1) resulted in a BLTS 3 classification for the facility and example 1 (part 2) resulted in a BLTS 4 classification for the facility. Since the two facilities are on the same route, the overall route classification is BLTS 4 (i.e., the worse of the classifications).Facility: Bicycle Lane at intersection approach | |||
---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | Value | BLTS Reference Table | BLTS Classification |
The Shared-Used Path Level of Service (SUPLOS)
calculator is used for bicycle analysis scenarios as described in. This tool is mainly used to evaluate bicycle mobility. Though the results of using this calculator will likely improve conditions for all modes on the path, it was designed from the bicyclist’s point of view. It was created with the following usage criteria:
- The tool is for shared paths with paved hard surfaces (e.g., asphalt or concrete).
- The tool uses the following modes as inputs:
- Adult bicyclists
- Pedestrians
- Runners
- In-line skaters
- Child bicyclists
- The tool is not applicable to trails with stop signs, signal controls, or road crossings with spacing less than 0.25 miles apart.
- The tool is best suited for two-way shared-use path facilities. It does not apply to on-street bicycle facilities.
Links to the SUPLOS calculator and user guide are provided in
Appendix O, Section 4 – Shared-Use Path Level of Service Calculator Guidance.