Section 2: Procurement
Proposal Process
Using competitive sealed proposals to award scientific service
contracts is the procurement process set forth under Tex. Transp.
Code ch. 223, subch. D.
TxDOT awards a scientific service contract to the technical
expert that possesses the required qualifications to perform the
work at fair and reasonable cost to TxDOT. TxDOT may use competitive sealed
proposals to procure scientific, appraisal, right of way acquisition,
and landscape architectural services.
43 TAC §9.82
Competitive Sealed Proposal Process
Notice
When TxDOT elects to use competitive sealed proposals to procure
appraisal, right of way acquisition, landscape architectural, and
scientific services, TxDOT must post a notice on the Electronic State
Business Daily. TxDOT will also publish a quarterly statewide list
of project contracts to be issued and will provide upon request,
or make available on TxDOT’s web site, a copy of the list to community,
business, and professional organizations for dissemination to their
membership.
43 TAC §9.83(a)
Letter of Interest
Providers interested in performing the scientific services
specified in the advertisement should submit a Letter of Interest
to TxDOT via fax or regular mail to the contact person indicated
in the advertisement. Upon receipt of the letter, the managing office
will send the provider a Request For Proposal (RFP) packet. Prospective
providers can also obtain an RFP for a particular contract by downloading
it from the TxDOT Internet web site or obtain one at the proposal
meeting, if one is to be held.
43 TAC §9.83(b)
Request For Proposal
The RFP packet communicates to the prospective provider what
to include in its written proposal and how to submit it to TxDOT.
The RFP, if completed properly, provides the technical expert a sound
understanding of the project’s specifications by providing an explanation
of the services and deliverables it will be required to perform
during the contract period.
Scientific service contracts require that payment be made
upon the completion of deliverables. Therefore, deliverables need
to be defined very specifically in the project’s RFP, allowing the
prospective provider to more easily estimate its price for performing
each of the required tasks.
Proposal Meeting
A proposal meeting may be either mandatory or optional at
the discretion of TxDOT. If the meeting is mandatory, TxDOT will
only accept proposals from providers represented at the meeting.
43 TAC §9.83(d)
Proposal Requirements
Proposals are subject to the following requirements:
- the proposal shall be limited to the contents specified in the RFP packet plus the provider’s price for the required services,
- all proposals must be received by the date, time, and location specified in the RFP packet,
- TxDOT will open proposals and conduct evaluations in confidence. After the contract is awarded, all proposals shall be open for public inspection, and
- a proposal which does not include all the requirements set forth in the RFP will be rejected as non-responsive and will not be considered further.
43 TAC §9.84
Evaluation
TxDOT will evaluate each responsive proposal based upon the
established standards communicated and set forth in the RFP. Each
standard, having been assigned its own numerical weighting value
previously communicated in the RFP, is scored using a numerical
scale. Standards used for evaluating a proposal may vary from project
to project.
43 TAC §9.85
Best and Final Offer
A provider is typically awarded the contract based upon the
initial score it receives on its proposal evaluation. However, there
are circumstances in which TxDOT may find it beneficial to meet
with the top ranked providers to discuss their best and final offer
prior to the award of the contract.
If TxDOT determines discussions for best and final offers
are necessary, then it must schedule individual meetings with the
three top-ranked providers. In the case of multiple provider selection, discussions
will be held with a number of providers equal to the number of contracts
to be awarded plus three. Discussions will include:
- any portion of the responsive proposal in order to assess a provider’s ability to meet the RFP requirements,
- an opportunity for the provider to demonstrate an understanding of the project and remedy the proposal’s deficiencies,
- reasonableness of fee.
Once all discussions have concluded, TxDOT will send written
notification to each provider to submit its best and final offer.
Once received, the revised proposals will be re-evaluated using
the original scoring standards.
43 TAC §9.86
Selection
These contracts are used for the award of individual or multiple
contracts in which the selected entity agrees to perform work under
a general scope of services. Work authorizations for specific tasks
will be issued to the selected entity on an as-needed basis. Work
authorizations must be issued for new projects within the two years
following execution of the prime contract. Thus, the contract period
for indefinite delivery contracts is four years. Work authorizations
can be issued after the initial 2-year period, but only if it is
necessary to complete projects that were started within the initial
2-year period after contract execution. However, new projects may
not be started more than two years after contract execution. Contracts
may not exceed a maximum amount payable of $2,000,000 for a contract
to provide services in a single district or $5,000,000 to provide services
in two or more districts.
43 TAC §9.87
Award
TxDOT will make an award to the provider submitting the highest-ranked
proposal and will notify the other providers of the selection. For
multiple awardees under a single RFP, TxDOT will make awards to
the highest ranked providers. If TxDOT finds that none of the proposals
are acceptable, TxDOT will reject all proposals
43 TAC §9.88