6.1 Structural Overlays
For flexible pavements, structural hot-mix overlay thicknesses
are designed using FPS 21 design, option 6. Currently, the only
department-approved rational method for design of structural HMA overlays
on rigid pavements is by using the appropriate overlay option in
DARWin® 3.1 (AASHTO 93). An M-E based program incorporating findings
of the balanced mix design approach (research project 0-5123) is
available in consultation with MNT – Pavement Asset Management.
In considering the actual overlay thickness, guidelines established
for lift thickness based on the type of mix / nominal maximum aggregate
size must be followed. In addition, the type of mix selected should
complement the overall structure in terms of resilience, durability,
permeability, texture, etc.
A reasonable investigation of the condition of the existing
substructure and hot-mix on the project must be made to ensure the
desired performance of the structural overlay. In addition to deflection measurements,
ground penetrating radar (GPR), when combined with selective coring,
is a rapid method of determining the depth and extent of delamination
or stripping problems. Where rutting-susceptible mixes exist in
the old structure, if these mixes are within 4 in. of the newly
overlaid surface, the chance of renewed rutting originating in the
old mix will still exist (zone of high shear and compression). Evaluation
of road cores for rutting and stripping susceptibility using Tex-242-E (Hamburg)
should be used if in doubt. Even if there is no evidence of current
stripping, it is advisable to evaluate the existing material for
stripping susceptibility; experience has shown that stripping problems
often start only after the new overlay is placed. There are also
certain surface materials that should not be overlaid, including
plant-mix seal or permeable friction courses (open-graded friction
courses). Where poor substructure is located, full-depth repair
should be accomplished prior to the overlay. In the case of Portland
cement concrete (PCC) pavements, a determination must be made into
the uniformity of the underlying support. The total pavement acceptance
device (TPAD) has been a useful tool in identifying areas of low
support. Slabs must be prevented from moving by stabilizing the
material beneath them. This involves drilling holes in an unstable
PCC slab or section and injecting an asphaltic, cementitious, or
high-density polymer material to fill any underlying voids. Typically,
this method is only an option for isolated instances of instability.
It does not work well as a general roadway treatment. Application
of a stress absorbing membrane interlayer such as the crack attenuating
mixture (CAM) may be useful in retarding reflective cracking when
overlaying jointed concrete pavements. CAM is a fine mix that is designed
for cracking resistance using the overlay tester or flexural beam
fatigue. The mix is typically placed 1 in. thick and should be covered
with an adequate overlay thickness to provide adequate resistance
to rutting (2.0 in. minimum is recommended).
Other reasons for removing a portion of the existing HMA surface
include leveling because of rutting, reducing crack width caused
by spalling, and eliminating raveling.
As a minimum, a higher rate of tack coat application will
be needed on a milled surface prior to overlaying. For planning
purposes, a seal coat may be applied to the surface of the milled
structure, especially if there are visible or latent cracks. The
designer should also consider other measures to thwart reflective
cracking through the new overlay. Geotextiles have been used successfully
for this purpose but require increased vigilance on the part of
the contractor to ensure manufacturer’s guidelines are strictly
followed. Mix design, selecting a mix that incorporates increased
resilience, low permeability, and overall mat thickness are also
important considerations.