6.3 Foundation Design

Special attention is required in designing a durable foundation by investigating the underlying soils to determine the appropriate type, level, and depth of stabilization needed. In lieu of subgrade stabilization, a high quality granular base, cement-treated base, or other engineered foundation can be used. Detailed design and construction considerations are provided in Figure 5-5.
Perpetual Pavement Design. (click in image to see full-size image)
Figure 5-5. Perpetual Pavement Design.
Table 5-8: Perpetual Pavement Layer Composition
Layer
Layer Composition
Spec Item
Preferred Mix Size
Preferred Lift Thickness
PG Grade
N
des
A
Renewable surface
 
SMA (or SP) or two-layer system PFC on top of SMA
(Passing Balance Mix Design criteria)
Item 342 (PFC
 
Item 346 (SMA)
 
Item 344 (SP)
SMA-D
1.5 in.
 
2.0 in.
 
2.0 in.
76-XX
 
76-XX
 
76-XX
50
 
50
 
50
B
Seal Cost
Item 316 or 318
Grade 4 or 4S
--
--
--
C
Rut-Resistant HMA Base
Item 344*
SP-B
4X nominal maximum aggregate size each lift
70-22**
50
D***
Dense Bottom Layer
Item 341
D
2.0 - 3.0 in.
64-22
35 (SGC); or 97.5% lab density (TGC)
E
Prepared Pavement Foundation
1. Item 247
 
2. Item 275
 
3. Item 260
 
4. SS 3003 or SS 3063
Grade 1/2
 
Min 200 psi UCS after conditioning
 
Passing Tex 121E Part 1
 
Passing Test methods 122E or 134E
6 - 12 in.
 
6 - 12 in.
 
8.0 in.
 
6 - 10 in.
 
 
 
 
 
 
PG 64-22 or CSS 1H
--
F
Natural subgrade
--
--
--
--
--
* Preference should be given to designing above the reference zone. Substitution of Item 344 mixtures using Item 341 is permitted after consulting with MNT – Pavement Asset Management.
** Use PG 70-22 or higher grade for all HMA mixes that fall within the top 6.0 in. of the finished pavement surface.
*** Can be eliminated if total HMA layer greater than 10 inches thick.
See Construction Considerations in figure above, layer E. Must be designed to pass a strength test - contact MTD for details.