Cost Recovery
Issues related to the acquisition of contaminated property
and cost recovery have become more complicated in recent years due
to the promulgation of risk-based corrective action regulations.
A risk-based closure of a site allows contamination to be left in
place as long as the contaminants do not constitute environmental
or health hazards to on-site or off-site receptors given the property uses.
As a result, TxDOT is increasingly confronted with the acquisition
of contaminated properties that may have already been, or are eligible
to be, closed by the jurisdictional regulatory agency.
Cost recovery and the allocation of corrective action responsibilities
depend upon the purpose of the cleanup. If the purpose of the cleanup
is solely to meet the transportation project's construction requirements,
and otherwise would not have been required by regulation, then the
cleanup costs should not be borne by the responsible party. On the
other hand, if contaminated property constitutes a health risk to
the general public above and beyond those incurred during the transportation
project's construction activities, then cleanup costs should be
borne by the responsible party. Cost recovery issues are complicated,
especially when related to disposal. Negotiation with the property
owner and/or responsible party may be necessary on a case-by-case basis.
The ROW Legal Section should be consulted for assistance.
The decision to recover costs through legal action should
be coordinated with ROW Legal Section, GCD and Texas’ Office of
the Attorney General, as appropriate.