1.1.2 Framework for Geometric Design

Historically, a range of “minimum” to “desirable” criteria for design values were provided with the “desirable” design criteria preferred. provides a framework by which projects should be assessed to determine appropriate design values rather than defaulting to a “minimum” or “desirable” value. This value is shown as the
“target” value
throughout the remainder of the manual.
“Target” values
are meant to serve as a starting point for selecting the specific design criteria. The final selected design criteria value may be more or in some cases less (a “minimum” value) than the “target” value. The designer should use their engineering judgement to select the final design criteria based on the functional classification, context classification and performance metrics of the project established during project scoping
Similarly, the RDM provides the following framework based on five factors:
  • Functional Classification
    – characterizes roadways by their position in the transportation network and the type of service it provides for vehicular traffic. See .
  • Context Classification System
    – characterizes roadways by their surrounding environment and their place in the community. See .
  • Modal Classification System
    – considers the needs of all transportation modes in design of the roadway. See .
  • Project Type of Construction
    – incorporates a design process to choose the appropriate design approach for each project. See .
  • Practical Design
    – an approach to finding and balancing the needs of all users for each project. See .
  • Performance-based Design
    – an approach for considering the effects of geometric design decisions. See .
The concept of
Performance-Based Practical Design (PBPD)
is a decision-making approach that helps agencies better manage transportation investments and serve system-level needs and performance priorities with limited resources. See for a full discussion of PBPD.