Runoff Coefficients
Urban Watersheds
Table 4-10 suggests ranges of C values for urban watersheds for various combinations of land use and soil/surface type. This table is typical of design guides found in civil engineering texts dealing with hydrology.
Type of drainage area | Runoff coefficient |
---|---|
Business: | |
Downtown areas | 0.70-0.95 |
Neighborhood areas | 0.30-0.70 |
Residential: | |
Single-family areas | 0.30-0.50 |
Multi-units, detached | 0.40-0.60 |
Multi-units, attached | 0.60-0.75 |
Suburban | 0.35-0.40 |
Apartment dwelling areas | 0.30-0.70 |
Industrial: | |
Light areas | 0.30-0.80 |
Heavy areas | 0.60-0.90 |
Parks, cemeteries | 0.10-0.25 |
Playgrounds | 0.30-0.40 |
Railroad yards | 0.30-0.40 |
Unimproved areas: | |
Sand or sandy loam soil, 0-3% | 0.15-0.20 |
Sand or sandy loam soil, 3-5% | 0.20-0.25 |
Black or loessial soil, 0-3% | 0.18-0.25 |
Black or loessial soil, 3-5% | 0.25-0.30 |
Black or loessial soil, > 5% | 0.70-0.80 |
Deep sand area | 0.05-0.15 |
Steep grassed slopes | 0.70 |
Lawns: | |
Sandy soil, flat 2% | 0.05-0.10 |
Sandy soil, average 2-7% | 0.10-0.15 |
Sandy soil, steep 7% | 0.15-0.20 |
Heavy soil, flat 2% | 0.13-0.17 |
Heavy soil, average 2-7% | 0.18-0.22 |
Heavy soil, steep 7% | 0.25-0.35 |
Streets: | |
Asphaltic | 0.85-0.95 |
Concrete | 0.90-0.95 |
Brick | 0.70-0.85 |
Drives and walks | 0.75-0.95 |
Roofs | 0.75-0.95 |
Rural and Mixed-Use Watershed
Table 4-11 shows an alternate, systematic approach for developing the runoff coefficient. This table applies to rural watersheds only, addressing the watershed as a series of aspects. For each of four aspects, the designer makes a systematic assignment of a runoff coefficient “component.” Using Equation 4-22, the four assigned components are added to form an overall runoff coefficient for the specific watershed segment.
The runoff coefficient for rural watersheds is given by:

Equation 4-22.
Where:
- C= runoff coefficient for rural watershed
- C= component of coefficient accounting for watershed reliefr
- C= component of coefficient accounting for soil infiltrationi
- C= component of coefficient accounting for vegetal coverv
- C= component of coefficient accounting for surface types
The designer selects the most appropriate values for C
r
, Ci
, Cv
, and Cs
from Table 4-11.
Watershed characteristic | Extreme | High | Normal | Low |
---|---|---|---|---|
Relief - C r | 0.28-0.35 Steep, rugged terrain with average slopes above 30% | 0.20-0.28 Hilly, with average slopes of 10-30% | 0.14-0.20 Rolling, with average slopes of 5-10% | 0.08-0.14 Relatively flat land, with average slopes of 0-5% |
Soil infiltration - C i | 0.12-0.16 No effective soil cover; either rock or thin soil mantle of negligible infiltration capacity | 0.08-0.12 Slow to take up water, clay or shallow loam soils of low infiltration capacity or poorly drained | 0.06-0.08 Normal; well drained light or medium textured soils, sandy loams | 0.04-0.06 Deep sand or other soil that takes up water readily; very light, well-drained soils |
Vegetal cover - C v | 0.12-0.16 No effective plant cover, bare or very sparse cover | 0.08-0.12 Poor to fair; clean cultivation, crops or poor natural cover, less than 20% of drainage area has good cover | 0.06-0.08 Fair to good; about 50% of area in good grassland or woodland, not more than 50% of area in cultivated crops | 0.04-0.06 Good to excellent; about 90% of drainage area in good grassland, woodland, or equivalent cover |
Surface Storage - C s | 0.10-0.12 Negligible; surface depressions few and shallow, drainageways steep and small, no marshes | 0.08-0.10 Well-defined system of small drainageways, no ponds or marshes | 0.06-0.08 Normal; considerable surface depression, e.g., storage lakes and ponds and marshes | 0.04-0.06 Much surface storage, drainage system not sharply defined; large floodplain storage, large number of ponds or marshes |
Table 4-11 note: The total runoff coefficient based on the 4 runoff components is C = C r + Ci + Cv + Cs |
While this approach was developed for application to rural watersheds, it can be used as a check against mixed-use runoff coefficients computed using other methods. In so doing, the designer would use judgment, primarily in specifying C
s
, to account for partially developed conditions within the watershed.