H- and HS-Load Ratings

Previously, all ratings were done with the equivalent H-truck and HS-truck. Currently, all ratings are only done with the HS-truck. A moment equivalency conversion from H- to HS-ratings is not recommended since this process would assume that the structure was exactly designed for the given H-loading. In addition, continuous spans cannot be converted by this process. Most structures have a degree of capacity past the design H-load, particularly since load distribution assumptions of the AASHTO Bridge Specifications1 have been made more liberal since the time many structures were commonly designed using H-loads. However, some bridges were intentionally designed with AS methods to a 5 percent overstress for some components.
It is not acceptable to ratio the design live load moments for an H-truck to the same moment for an equivalent HS-truck. For instance, if a 48-ft simple-span bridge has a design load of H-15, the design load for moment equivalency would be HS-10.8. However, due to the above reasons, the actual rating based on LF methods might easily be HS-9 or HS-13. A LF rating must be generated due to the uncertainty of the actual design practice used.
1. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, AASHTO, 1994