Because the Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (TOPRS) is federally funded, TxDOT must prepare a service-level environmental impact statement (EIS) to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The service-level EIS will rely on conceptual passenger rail alternatives to identify a preferred alternative or, more likely, a package of preferred alternatives for different sections of the corridor. Depending on the identified preferred alternatives, more detailed studies may be required under NEPA. More information is available on the frequently asked questions page.
The first step in the EIS process is scoping. During scoping, TxDOT and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) invited the public to provide input about what should be studied in the service-level EIS. Specifically, TxDOT asked for input on the following:
During the scoping period, which closed on April 26, 2013, TxDOT accepted public comments in writing (at open houses or through the mail), through this website, and at public meetings held throughout the corridor. During this time, TxDOT received more than 1,500 comments.
Service-Level Draft EIS
The service-level draft EIS will document the impacts, benefits and costs of each passenger rail alternative compared to the no-build alternative. The draft EIS will consider a broad range of topics, including natural resources such as fish and wildlife habitat, wetlands and water quality, as well as community resources such as economic development, land use and historic properties.
In January and February 2014, TxDOT asked the public to review a small list of recommended route and service-level alternatives for intercity passenger rail between Oklahoma City and south Texas. More than 300 people attended the eight in-person meetings, and more than 3,800 people visited the online meeting. The resources from these meetings are provided on the Meeting Materials page. After reviewing that input, TxDOT determined which alternatives should be studied in the service-level draft EIS. Fact sheets are available that describe each of these alternatives.
Once the draft EIS is complete, TxDOT and FRA will publish it for public review. The review period will include many ways for the public to provide comments, including at least one public hearing. After the public review period is complete, TxDOT and FRA will agree on a preferred alternative, or a package of preferred alternatives for sections of the corridor, for passenger rail service in the corridor.
Service-Level Final EIS and Record of Decision (ROD)
Once a preferred alternative is identified, TxDOT will prepare a final EIS that responds to comments received on the draft EIS. It will also include additional detail, such as mitigation measures for unavoidable impacts that might result from the preferred alternative. Once the final EIS is complete, FRA will issue a record of decision (ROD), which codifies the FRA’s concurrence with the service-level NEPA process.
TxDOT also will prepare a service development plan to complete the service-level final EIS. This plan will outline the passenger service concepts, public benefits and a financial plan for potential future development of the corridor based on the preferred alternatives. It will prioritize potential projects to be developed within the corridor, identify costs and potential funding sources. As this study concludes, various parties can examine the material in the service development plan and make informed decisions about further development of the concepts.