|
Problem Statement
An important candidate for the application of
recycled materials is traffic sign blanks or substrates,
(the structural element on which information is
presented). Approximately $250 million is spent each
year in maintaining 58 million traffic signs that are
spread over 3.8 million miles of roads, streets, and
highways in the United States. Increasing the use of
recycled materials for sign substrates could mean
significant savings in direct replacement costs and
reductions in detrimental environmental effects.
Research programs are underway in many states that are
seeking to find alternative substrates for signs with
State and Federal agencies testing these new substrates
in the field. The ultimate goal is to reduce material
and maintenance costs.
Texas currently uses sign blanks made from either
high-grade plywood or aluminum. The costs for these
materials are constantly increasing, and the ultimate
disposal of these materials is contributing to landfill
problems. Finding alternative materials for use as sign
blanks that can reduce life-cycle cost and aid the
environment is becoming a high priority. In response,
industries have developed composite material substrates
made of: recycled plastic, fiber-reinforced plastics,
rubber-plastic blends and alloys made of recycled
aluminum.
In order to use a recycled material as a sign
substrate, a method for determining the required
thickness of a particular material must be available.
However, the thickness dimension of sign blanks made
from marine plywood or aluminum in current use along
Texas highways is not designed according to engineering
formulas. Rather, specifications are based on field
experience over many years of installation. Newer
materials, such as recycled plastics, have different
properties than the traditional substrates and a
database of practical experience is not available.
Therefore, it is imperative that tests be conducted to
characterize the behavior of several of these new
materials.
Knowledge of these properties, in turn, enables a
design procedure to be developed. In this way, required
sign thickness manufactured from virtually any suitable
material can be specified, taking into account
properties such as density, stiffness, strength, as well
as the geometry of the sign and its supports.
Objectives
The Texas Transportation Institute conducted study
0-1338, "Recycled Content Sign Blanks", to determine the
feasibility of using sign blanks constructed of
reclaimed materials instead of conventional high-grade
plywood and aluminum.
The primary objective of this study was to develop a
procedure by which candidate recycled materials may be
evaluated, designed for use as sign blanks, and
analyzed. The components of the study were to:
- review literature in this field
- draft a set of performance specifications
- gather and test materials that are viable sign
substrate candidates
- develop and perform a material testing program
- develop a design procedure based upon material
properties
- develop a laboratory procedure that may be used
to analyze the performance of the substrate that has
been designed.
For this study, various types of recycled materials
were solicited from commercial manufacturers and
subjected to an array of laboratory tests and numerical
simulations. These recycled materials included
high-density polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyvinyl
chloride, and calcium carbonate. A total of seven
recycled materials were tested for flexure, uni-axial
tension, creep, free vibration, and exposure to
ultraviolet radiation. Performance and properties of the
tested materials are included in the study.
Findings
Aluminum and wood are the substrates most frequently
used for traffic signs. Grades 6061 (heat treatable) and
5052 (non-heat treatable) aluminum alloys are widely
used. Currently, grade 3000 aluminum alloys, which are
made primarily from recycled aluminum, are also being
specified.
In order to purchase consistent quality recycled sign
blanks, it is necessary to develop a procedure by which
the blanks may be designed and certified. A need for
design procedure results from variability in: densities,
mechanical properties, and serviceability of substrates
produced by manufacturers of recycled products. As
recycling technologies advance and the quality of
recycled materials improve, a design procedure for
roadside signs will enable a material supplier to
closely match the material properties and serviceability
of their products with the specific need.
Researchers concluded that recycled sign blanks need
to be durable in diverse climatic conditions, and be
ductile and able to dissipate energy of vibration at a
reasonable rate.
Implementation
Draft specifications for two-pole supported and
tee-pole supported recycled content sign blanks were
prepared. These specifications include: general
characteristics, mechanical properties, preliminary
performance requirements (panel smoothness, adhesion,
impact resistance, creep, and workability), and
secondary performance requirements (mechanical tests,
wind simulation, thermal stability, and field testing).
A rational design procedure based on ASCE 7-95 and
various deflection criteria was also developed. This
procedure, when incorporated with the proposed
performance specifications, provides a method that
allows recycled materials to be approved for use as sign
blanks. The procedure also makes it possible for the
design of sign blanks to become more efficient as more
information is gathered on the types of wind and
environmental loads to which roadside structures are
subjected.
Researchers recommended that additional work be conducted,
including:
- review the design procedure for moderate-sized
signs, especially checking the wind load provisions
in order to serve as a final standard for design
- install and evaluate UV-stabilized recycled sign
blanks in various dimensions in a variety of
geographical and climatic locations around the state
- require other manufacturers of recycled sign
blanks to show through certified laboratory and/or
field testing that they meet or exceed the
performance specifications for sign blanks.
The contents of this summary are reported in detail
in Texas Transportation Institute Report 0-1338,
"Recycled Content Sign Blanks," Paul N. Roschke, Ben F.
Harrison IV, and Fred Benson, October 1996. This summary
does not necessarily reflect the official views of the
FHWA, USDOT or TxDOT. |