|
Problem Statement
Each year, roofing manufacturers in the U.S. produce approximately 1,000,000
tons of new waste shingles and shingle trimmings. Moreover, residential and
commercial roofing replacement generates 8 to 10 million tons of old roofing
waste. Historically, about 95% (or 22 million cubic yards) of this valuable,
nonbiodegradable solid waste has ended up in landfills.
More than 500 million tons of asphalt mixture are produced annually in the
U.S., about 90% of which is hot-mix asphalt (HMA). Using approximately 2%
roofing waste in all asphalt mixtures placed would consume all manufacturing and
consumer waste roofing produced each year.
Objectives
The Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) conducted study 0-1344 "Roofing
Shingles and Toner in Asphalt Pavement", for TxDOT, the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to
evaluate the inclusion of roofing shingles from manufacturing and consumer waste
streams in hot-mix asphalt.
Findings
Researchers examined published and unpublished information on the use of
waste roofing materials in HMA. The literature search showed that several small
laboratory efforts and field tests using waste shingles in HMA have been
conducted.
Researchers then performed laboratory experiments on asphalt mixtures
containing manufacturing waste and consumer waste. Manufacturing waste shingles
are defined as new material that is obtained from a roofing shingle production
plant. Manufacturing waste is a very uniform, predictable product and is the
most promising source for rapid implementation of these study findings. Consumer
waste shingles are those obtained during the removal of existing roofs, and make
up the bulk of the scrap shingle supply. Consumer waste is inherently quite
variable in quality and may be contaminated with various other building
construction materials. However, consumer waste has been successfully used in
hot mix asphalt (HMA) as much or more than manufacturing waste.
Two types of HMA were modified with ground roofing and tested in the
laboratory. These included a dense-graded, Type D mixture and a coarse
matrix-high binder (CMHB) Type C mixture. The roofing materials were added to
the HMAs at 5% and 10%, and the engineering properties of the resulting HMA
mixtures were compared to untreated mixtures. Laboratory tests measured the
effects of the roofing wastes on Hveem stability, indirect tension, resilient
modulus at several temperatures, moisture susceptibility, TxDOT static creep,
air void contact, and voids in the mineral aggregate.
The findings of this study indicate:
- Roofing waste can be used in HMA.
- It should be possible to produce materials that will meet TxDOT's
standard quality control specifications using up to 5% roofing waste
into typical HMA surface mixtures and up to 10% roofing waste in base
mixtures.
- Roofing waste must be shredded in order to use it successfully in
asphalt mixtures. The finer the roofing is shredded, the better it is
for incorporation into asphalt mixes.
- A CMHB mixture with higher voids in the mineral aggregate and
thicker asphalt film can accommodate roofing wastes better than a
dense-graded mixture.
- Mixing and compaction temperatures of HMA may need to be increased
in the laboratory and in the field to accommodate the relatively stiffer
roofing-modified mixtures. Standard compaction temperatures may yield
higher air voids than desirable.
- Standard TxDOT hot mix asphalt design procedures appear satisfactory
for designing mixtures containing roofing waste.
- Standard TxDOT hot mix asphalt design procedures appear satisfactory
for evaluating mixtures containing roofing waste.
- For purposes of mixture design and construction, waste roofing can
be handled using the techniques already established for reclaimed
asphalt pavement (RAP).
Implementation
Guidelines and specifications have been developed for constructing asphalt
concrete pavements containing scrap shingles which addresses mix design, shingle
processing, plant production, placement and compaction, and shingle-use
specifications.
In general, manufacturing roof waste is preferred over consumer waste
because: it is more uniform in content; the asphalt is softer and more
functional in a paving mixture; it is not contaminated with nails, wood, and
other deleterious materials, it contains no organic roofing felt or asbestos.
Deleterious materials can generally be removed from roofing materials torn off
old roofs by screening the material over a 12.5 mm or smaller sieve prior to
incorporation into the hot mix asphalt.
It is probable that a high percentage of the roofing waste generated in Texas
cannot be used in cold-applied paving materials because of this application's
relatively low volume when compared to hot mix asphalt. Nevertheless, the hard
asphalt, fibers, and angular fine aggregate in ground roofing waste appear to
have potential not only for use in cold-applied asphalt maintenance mixtures but
also in actually improving their quality.
The contents of this summary are reported in detail in The Texas A&M
University System's Texas Transportation Institute Research Report 1344-2F,
"Shingle and Toner In Asphalt Pavements," Joe W. Button, Devon Williams, and
James A. Scherocman, Preliminary Report Dated - November 1995. This summary does
not necessarily reflect the official views of the FHWA, TCEQ, or TxDOT.
|