|
Problem Statement
Successful recycling collection programs have produced large quantities of
broken glass, or cullet, in many parts of the country. Glass cullet is primarily
reused to manufacture new glass containers.
Using cullet in glassmaking saves energy and reduces costs. But using cullet
also has limitations, primarily due to the need to avoid color contamination and
to the cost of transportation. Supplying cullet to furnace-ready specifications
requires expensive color sorting, and because of its relative high density,
glass cullet is expensive to transport long distances.
Using glass cullet in roadway construction would eliminate the need for
expensive sorting and offers an opportunity to use glass cullet as aggregate in
parts of the state where aggregate sources are scarce.
Objectives
The Texas Tech University College of Engineering conducted study 0-1331, "Use
Of Glass Cullet In Roadway Construction", for TxDOT, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)
to identify sound engineering and environmental uses of glass cullet in roadway
construction and maintenance projects and develop specifications for each
successful use of glass cullet evaluated based on current TxDOT specifications.
Procedures
Specifications for using glass cullet in roadway construction were developed
through the following three phases of study:
- Literature review and identification of available sources and
suppliers, including:
- A recommendation of which glass cullet uses appear the most
feasible and promising
- Potential disadvantages or obstacles to these uses
- Potential effects on future recyclability
- Limited economic analysis comparing the use of glass cullet with
currently utilized materials for the selected applications
- A description of available sources and suppliers in Texas.
- Laboratory testing. Laboratory testing was conducted to provide
information not available from the literature search or to assure the
accuracy of information found. Testing focused on problem areas
identified by other researchers.
- Specification development. Specifications were developed for each
successful use of glass cullet evaluated in the course of this study,
following TxDOT current specification formats and requirements.
Findings
The economic viability of glass recycling for highway construction depends
upon the market situation in a given area. Highway professionals with experience
using glass cullet and industry experts in the glass recycling industry
indicated that if there were a market for glass cullet in the highway industry,
it would be economically competitive with other materials in major metropolitan
areas and their surrounding vicinities. These professionals also indicated that
a market for color-mixed waste glass could significantly increase
glass-collection efforts in recycling programs.
Other DOTs' specifications indicate there are a variety of uses for glass
cullet, ranging from asphalt concrete to drainage backfill.
In general, using glass cullet in asphalt concrete is not considered as
attractive an option as other uses due to problems associated with asphalt
stripping in moist conditions. The use of glass cullet in portland cement
concrete is not feasible due to the high levels of alkali-silica reactivity
associated with it. This problem is considered to be particularly acute with
fine cullet.
Implementation
This study and others have concluded that:
- From an engineering standpoint, cullet appears to be an excellent
supplement or replacement for gravel in many construction applications.
- There has been no appreciable environmental impact when cullet has
been tested for harmful contaminants and potential for leaching over
time.
- Since glass contains silica rather than crystalline silica, it does
not have the health risks associated with natural sand.
- In many cases, and depending on local conditions, using glass can be
cost-competitive or less expensive than using conventional aggregates.
Based on available information, from an engineering standpoint glass cullet
is suitable for a variety of uses. The economic feasibility varies depending on
the locale and availability of glass in large quantities. Specifications were
developed for the following applications:
|
TxDOT Item # |
Application |
Percentage of Glass Cullet Permitted |
|
132 |
Embankments |
Shall not exceed 20 % by weight of the total mix |
|
247 |
Flexible base (Type D) |
Shall not exceed 20 % by weight of the total mix |
|
301 |
Asphalt anti-stripping agents |
When cullet is used as an aggregate in asphalt-stabilized bases, lime
and some liquid anti-stripping agents may not perform adequately |
|
345 |
Asphalt-stabilized base |
Shall not exceed 5 % of the total weight of the
aggregate |
|
400 |
Excavation and backfill for structures |
- Utility bedding material may comprise
up to 100%.
- Backfill that will support any portion of roadbed or embankment shall include
less than 20%.
- Backfill that does not support any portion of the roadbed or
embankment may include up to 100%
|
|
423 |
Retaining wall |
Structural backfill limited to maximum of 20%. Non-structural backfill
up to 100% |
|
556 |
Pipe under drains |
Up to 100% |
|
Other |
Open-graded base courses |
The use of
cullet in this application shall be governed by Item 345, "Asphalt-stabilized
base." Not to exceed 5%. |
The contents of this summary are reported in detail in Texas Tech University
College of Engineering Research Reports 0-1331-1 and 0-1331-3, "Use Of Glass
Cullet In Roadway Construction," Phillip T. Nash, Priyantha Jayawickrama,
Richard W. Tock, Sanjaya Senadheera, Krishnan Viswanathan, and Binli Woolverton,
August 1995. This summary does not necessarily reflect the official views of the
FHWA, TCEQ, or TxDOT. |