Shop Drawings
Electronic Submission of Shop Drawings
The Bridge Division accepts eligible, electronically submitted
shop drawings for
review and Bridge Division approval. Eligible shop drawings conform to
requirements identified in the
Guide to Electronic Shop Drawing Submittal. Ineligible submittals are
returned unreviewed. Note: We are currently studying the possibility of
web-based submission of shop plans.
Items Reviewed by the Bridge Division
Submit to the Bridge Division only eligible documents; eligible documents are
shop drawings that meet the following criteria:
- They have been designed by TxDOT's Bridge Division, by TxDOT districts if
Bridge Division review has been requested by the district, or by a
consultant if Bridge Division review has been requested by the district or
if the consultant is under contract to the Bridge Division.
- They are for items identified by "1" - "5" in the Division Review Contact
column of
this table, or they are based on standard drawings dated before June
2004 for sealed expansion joints, armored joints, concrete piling, or
concrete panels.
The TxDOT area engineer should communicate submittal requirements
summarized in
this table to the Contractor at or before the preconstruction
meeting, based on who performed the structural design.
Research Project 5197 Implementation - Shop Plan
Handling Exceptions
The
Research Project 5197
Implementation page provides instruction on how to handle shop plan resubmittals and “modified” optional designs associated with the
implementation of Research Project 5197 findings.
Optional (Alternate) Designs
As of September 10, 2009, per a Texas Board of Professional
Engineers ruling:
- Any shop drawing sheet that contains structural design
information that departs from contract plan design values must
be sealed, signed and dated by an engineer registered in the
state of Texas.
- Optional designs typically propose design values that vary
from contract plan designs and therefore fall under this
requirement.
- Similarly, and even though originally proposed and
sanctioned by TxDOT, sheets containing 5197 based release
strength reductions (“modified” optional designs) must also be
sealed.
- Previously, only the cover sheet of the calculations that
were required to accompany optional or alternate designs was
required to be sealed.
- Now, the calculations cover sheet as well as the associated
shop drawing detail sheets must be sealed.
Submittal Requirements for Metal Railing
Specification Item 450 requires shop-drawing approval as specified by contract
plans. Submit shop drawings for curved railing to the Engineer of Record for
approval of railing on horizontal curves meeting the following criteria:
|
Rail Type |
Criteria |
| T1-W |
All horizontally curved rail. |
| T101, T101RC |
Steel Tube (w/ W-beam) at 600-ft or less radius. |
| T401 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| T402 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| T6 |
At expansion joints greater than 1 1/4". |
| T77 |
Always submit for approval. |
| T80HT |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft. or less. |
| C1W |
All horizontally curved rail. |
| * HT |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| * C203 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| C221 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| C223 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less |
| C402 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| * C501 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| * C502 |
Horizontal curve 2,800-ft or less. |
| PR1-3 |
Horizontal curve 600-ft or less. |
| PR3-HD |
Horizontal curve 600-ft or less. |
| * B3 |
Horizontal curve 600-ft or less. |
Note: An asterisk (*) denotes rails not currently published as
Standard Rail Drawings, but may appear in plans from past lettings.
Always check the applicable standard drawing for submittal criteria updates.
For metal railing not requiring shop drawing approval, erection drawings showing
section lengths, splice locations, rail post spacing and anchor bolt setting
shall be submitted to the Engineer for approval.
Presubmittal Checks
Before submitting shop drawings for review, check the following:
- Each bridge component must be referenced to a placement layout with an
orientation mark for placement and review.
- Each drawing should have sufficient information for correct
fabrication and inspection without reference to any standard drawing.
- Each drawing must be legible at full scale on a monitor without
zooming in (that is, 1-inch width on an 11 x 17 inch sheet is 1 inch on
the monitor).
- Detailers should use drawing practices similar to those used in TxDOT
standard drawings. Fonts must be no smaller than those used on TxDOT
standard drawings.
- The first sheet of optional (alternate) design calculations and all
affected shop drawing detail sheets must be sealed, signed and dated by
an engineer registered in the state of Texas.
Please review the Submittal
Checklist and
Example Submittal.
Shop Plan Review Contacts
Send eligible shop plan submittals with PDF or DAT attachments directly to
the
reviewing office. Contact the area engineer or the district bridge engineer
for information on the reviewing office. For more information, please
contact us.
Terminology
Shop plan discussions include the following terminology:
- Shop drawing - Fabrication detail sheet prepared by fabricators for
their manufacturing shop to use in fabrication of bridge components in
compliance with contract plans and applicable TxDOT specifications and
standards. Typically the Engineer of Record reviews shop drawings. Shop
drawings become part of the as-built drawings for the completed structure.
- Working drawing - Forming detail sheet prepared for or by the
contractor for form work, false work, shoring, or erection. Work detailed
does not require review by the engineer of record. However, a Professional
Engineer must sign and seal these drawings. Submittal is required, but
approval is not required.
- Engineer - TxDOT's executive director or authorized
representative. For shop or working drawing submittals, the engineer is
usually the Area Engineer or District Bridge Engineer.
- Engineer of Record - The design engineer who signs and seals the
bridge plans. The Engineer of Record is a Bridge Engineer with the district,
Bridge Division, or a consultant. Review responsibility should be
established during a pre-construction meeting.
- (MOD) - Modified standard. These are items detailed on TxDOT
standard drawings that have been modified by a design engineer. They are
distinguished by a (MOD) label in the title block and are subject to
requirements for shop drawing submission and review by the Engineer of
Record.
- (Alt Dsn) - Alternate design. Precast alternate designs for box
culverts, junction boxes, and manhole/inlet items and any required
calculations are typically submitted to the Engineer for approval. These
designs are sealed by the fabricator's engineer and do not go through the
usual shop plan review. Though commonly reviewed by TxDOT districts, these
submittals are also reviewed by the Bridge Design Section at the request of
the Engineer.